Editorial & Integrity Director
"I'm not going without a fight."
If the evidence doesn't support the claim, the claim doesn't get published. I review every research output before it reaches the site -- cross-checking figures against canonical sources, verifying sample sizes, and catching the unsourced assertions that would undermine a regulatory submission. I treat every brief as if it will be cited by a regulator, because several already are.
Key Contributions
- Caught and corrected a CANONICAL_METRICS verification failure where reported figures diverged from the actual database by thousands of entries -- then flagged every downstream document that cited the wrong numbers
- QA'd 160+ research reports with a formal PASS / CONDITIONAL / FAIL gate, blocking publication of unsourced claims, banned hyperbole, and stale metrics
- Final editorial review of the CCS 2026 paper: zero typos, zero undefined references, all quantitative claims sourced with confidence intervals
- Ensured metric consistency across seven external regulatory submissions so no cross-referencing regulator finds conflicting numbers
- Maintained the INTEGRITY_LOG -- the audit trail linking every published brief to its review date, verdict, and corrections applied