Active Research

Legal
analysis

6 memos on AI safety law, liability, and regulatory frameworks

Research Context

Disclaimer: These memos are research documents produced for academic and policy analysis purposes. They do not constitute legal advice. The analysis reflects the state of law at the time of writing and may not account for subsequent legislative or judicial developments. Consult qualified legal counsel for jurisdiction-specific guidance.
LR-48 Multi-jurisdictional (AU, EU, US -- analysed separately)

Iatrogenic Safety Harm and Product Liability: When Safety Features Cause Injury
LR-49 Multi-jurisdictional (AU, EU, US -- analysed separately)

The DETECTED_PROCEEDS Problem: Liability When AI Systems Detect and Ignore Safety Concerns
LR-50 Multi-jurisdictional (AU, EU, US -- analysed separately)

Normative Drift and Autonomous Agent Liability: When AI Systems Rationalise Safety Violations
LR-51 Multi-jurisdictional (AU, EU, US -- analysed separately)

Legal Implications of Ineffective AI Safety Defenses -- When System Prompts Fail
LR-52 Multi-jurisdictional (AU, EU, US -- analysed separately)

The Legal Status of AI Reasoning Traces — Discovery, Admissibility, and the Right to Explanation
LR-53 Multi-jurisdictional (AU, EU, US -- analysed separately)

Unreliable Safety Metrics and Regulatory Compliance -- When Keyword Classifiers Inflate Safety Claims

This research informs our commercial services. See how we can help →